Re: Game Discussion

by **Lady Corrine Marsten** Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:12 am

I'm enjoying Corrine playing wingman to Daveth. Smile

by **Davain Bartheld** Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:21 pm

Where should I make my House fortune rolls?

by **Kevan Lyras** Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:53 pm

In the llast offseason there was a specific thread for this: viewtopic.php?f=161&
t=1429

I'd imagine we handle it similarly this time

by **Reader** Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm

Davain Bartheld wrote:Where should I make my House fortune rolls?

Thanks for the post above Ser Kevan.

Similar thread for this round of House Fortunes has been created:

posting.php?mode=post&
f=213

by **Theomore Tullison** Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:49 pm

Also got around to chronicle chapter 1 and 2 stuff (assuming the Frank Mooton part stands) for Theo, plus some other tidbits from pre-chapter 1 thrown in as revealed through play.

viewtopic.php?f=75&
t=121&
p=357#p357

by **Septon Arlyn** Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 pm

Everyone and their updating... Reminded me that mine is long overdue. Perhaps I will work on that tonight while the paint drys...

by **Theomore Tullison** Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:39 pm

Ah, House Marsten, such stellar work by their maester in educating his charges on the proper formulation of treaty texts....it's sort of commendable that people enter that event with 2d6 knowledge, actually. But, yeah

by **Kevan Lyras** Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:43 pm

Yeah we truely outdid ourselves! :-)
(Greedy bunch!)

by **Reader** Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:44 pm

The temptation of my "
hurt your house for personal goodies"
event structure was a hit!

by **Septon Arlyn** Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:50 pm

Theomore Tullison wrote:Ah, House Marsten, such stellar work by their maester in educating his charges on the proper formulation of treaty texts....it's sort of commendable that people enter that event with 2d6 knowledge, actually. But, yeah

That's what I was thinking

by **Reader** Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:04 pm

Should never have sacked Maester Leopold. Don't see the Drakeson's botching the treaty work. :;
):

Another fine decision by Lady Isobel Marsten.

I tell you, those Andals are right about female rulers.

by **Theomore Tullison** Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:07 pm

Gwyn would have if she wasn't a stubborn perfectionist :;
):

by **Gwyneth Drakeson** Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:42 am

Hee hee

I only would have failed that one roll, okay? Smile

And it seems Reader didn't give me the DoS for it anyway. Razz

(^_^)

by **Reader** Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:00 am

Gwyneth Drakeson wrote:Hee hee

I only would have failed that one roll, okay?

And it seems Reader didn't give me the DoS for it anyway.

(^_^)

Whoops, link me up and I can double check. Smile

by **Lady Corrine Marsten** Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:17 pm

Reader wrote:Should never have sacked Maester Leopold. Don't see the Drakeson's botching the treaty work. :;
):

Another fine decision by Lady Isobel Marsten.

I tell you, those Andals are right about female rulers.

How very dare you, sir!

by **Reader** Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:44 pm

Andal Patriarchy 4 Life y'all. :8-):

by **Lady Corrine Marsten** Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:55 pm

Reader wrote:Andal Patriarchy 4 Life y'all. :8-):

Green propaganda!

by **Gwyneth Drakeson** Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:58 pm

Scrutinizing the Treaty:
viewtopic.php?f=191&
t=2541

In my post I got 2 bonus dice from my Will roll, then rolled on the other three a 16, another 16, and a 17 versus a TN of 10, for 2 DoS each.

It's tricky, because my second roll was a 7 before I rolled the bonus dice. But then the bonus dice both came up sixes, jumping the fail up to 2 DoS.

by **Reader** Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:10 am

Gwyneth Drakeson wrote:Scrutinizing the Treaty:
viewtopic.php?f=191&
t=2541

In my post I got 2 bonus dice from my Will roll, then rolled on the other three a 16, another 16, and a 17 versus a TN of 10, for 2 DoS each.

It's tricky, because my second roll was a 7 before I rolled the bonus dice. But then the bonus dice both came up sixes, jumping the fail up to 2 DoS.

Fixed! I had the stupids.

by **Gwyneth Drakeson** Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:26 am

*tips hat*

Thankee-sai.

by **Septon Arlyn** Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:43 am

[url:17yqhg43]https:
//docs.
google.
com/spreadsheets/d/1ofK_LuN4D6rFjpIE3Xvj7jsLzPsOpMKMFPvEifGwSgM/edit#gid=0[/url:17yqhg43]

here is a link to a spreadsheet that I made to help track house fortnes. At house Dulver we have a "
game of dulvers"
were we each compete against each other as well as against Lord Dulver and Maester Falsten in order to try and control what the focus is of the house, as well as having to enter into an intrigue if we want Lord Dulver to spend anything (greedy penny pincher that he is :;
): oh wait, I mean frugal, wealth conscience, hyper protective and smart lord Rolling Eyes

)

feel free to barrow this format if it fits your needs. I find it easier to view things on spread sheets and feel like I can make more sense of what is happening if I view it this way. Also I add links to the rolls that I made in the spread sheet so things can be quickly and easily verified.

This is fairly basic, but it gets the Idea across :;
):

by **Gwyneth Drakeson** Thu Feb 18, 2016 6:16 pm

After reading Arlyn's White Harbor post, all I can think is that I want Lord Bolton's first name to be Mikael.

Love him or hate him, all will acknowledge he can belt a power ballad. Smile

by **Baelon Drakeson** Thu Feb 18, 2016 6:38 pm

Or perhaps he is a diminutive office worker who is filled to the brim with repressed anger, and people keep thinking that he must really like the music of a famous minstrel that happens to share his name (from a remote, lesser branch of the house, perhaps) he feels the rage build up in him until he can take it out on a poor hapless fax machine - er, I mean, smallfolk.

by **Gwyneth Drakeson** Thu Feb 18, 2016 6:39 pm

It wouldn't be a problem if he could just get his TPS parchments in on time!

by **Baelon Drakeson** Thu Feb 18, 2016 7:35 pm

Maybe he didn't get the memo.

by Sponsored content